Introduction
The lee side of the Rocky Mountains experiences the most frequent, intense and severe
hailstorms, but more specifically, the state of Colorado (Mahoney et al., 2012). Cloud seeding seeks to engineer clouds in order to decrease hail size for various benefits such as for the agricultural industry. Fully-funded and operational cloud seeding programs have been on-going in the USA since the1950’s, although literature shows controversial results (Strong et al., 2007). While the loss of crops is costly, cloud seeding also has a large price tag. Where weather engineering is used to decrease hail size and frequency, it is critical to ensure operations occur where the benefit is most needed. This brief research attempts to highlight the possible areas where cloud seeding could be the most beneficial in the state of Colorado.
Publicly available data were obtained from the Colorado Department of Agriculture, USGS, ESRI, NCDC (NWS), SPC and NOAA from April to September from 1988-2017. This 6-month interval over the 30 years was chosen to represent an approximate growing season, where crops would be most impacted. ESRI’s ArcGIS software was used to analyze and visualize the results, as shown below.
Methodology
An Optimized Hot Spot Analysis was used to generate hot spots where clusters of large hail size (magnitude) were reported in Figure 4. This doesn’t mean large hail wasn’t reported anywhere else, but this shows locations within close proximity of other locations where large hail was reported. Darkest red shows highest significance of large hail whereas darkest blue shows lowest significance. Grey dots show all hail reports.
Results
When examining the spatial variability of the data (Figure 4), it is clear that the northeast region of Colorado experiences the largest hail size (magnitude). It is also apparent that an overwhelming majority of hail reports are collected roadside, which poses a limitation to the analysis in the true distribution of large hail across an agricultural area potentially dominated by fields (i.e. no roadways).
Results from the hot spot analysis and total annual agriculture sales per county in 2012 were overlaid in Figure 5. Where the goal of cloud seeding is to protect the agricultural sector or minimize insurance claims due to hail damage, cloud-seeding operations in Colorado may have the largest impact in Morgan County (circled in pink).
Author: Larissa Gospodyn
Editor: Francis Lavigne-Theriault
References
Mahoney, K., Alexander, M.A., Thompson, G., Barsugli, J.J. & Scott, J.D. (2012). Changes in hail and flood risk in high-resolution simulations over Colorado’s mountains. Nature Climate Change, 2, 125-131.
Strong, G.S., Kochtubajda, B., Summers, P.W., Renick, J.H., Krauss, T.W., Humphries, R.G. & Lozowski, E.P. (2007). 50th Anniversary of hail studies in Alberta: Accomplishments and legacy. CMOS Bulletin SCMO Special Issue, 35, 3-19.